The first experience of bipolar transurethral operations in surgery of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Authors

  • Nikolaj A. Glotov Road clinical hospital at the station Yaroslavl of JSC «RZD»
  • Nikolaj E. Sokolov Road clinical hospital at the station Yaroslavl of JSC «RZD»
  • Yurij B. Smolyakov Road clinical hospital at the station Yaroslavl of JSC «RZD»

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25726/NM.2019.71.95.002

Keywords:

benign prostatic hyperplasia, bipolar transurethral resection and enucleation of the prostate, surgery, methods, prostate, patients

Abstract

The results of the introduction into surgical practice of the urological Department of the road clinical hospital of Yaroslavl bipolar technique of transurethral resection (BTTR) and enucleation of the prostate (EOTP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) of medium and large sizes are presented.

The comparative study included 164 patients, divided by the methods of surgery into 2 main groups (EOTP - 33 people, BTTR - 49) and 2 control (open prostatectomy - OPE - 38 and monopolar TTR - 44). For new endoscopic methods, a significant reduction in the volume of blood loss, the frequency of hemorrhagic complications, the timing of postoperative catheterization and hospitalization was established. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used to quantify the differences in mean and relative indicators, qualitative characteristics were evaluated using Pearson test (χ2), the significance level of the differences for the study was chosen p ≤ 0.05.

Analysis of postoperative dynamics of clinical parameters in the medium term showed similar radicality and effectiveness of the compared methods.

The lower invasiveness, greater safety and better tolerability of bipolar endoscopic operations demonstrate the prospects of their implementation instead of the former standard surgical methods, which will improve the quality of surgical treatment and reduce the costs of the hospital

References

1. Apolikhin O.I., Sevryukov F.A., Sorokin D.A., Karpukhin I.V., Puchkin A.B., Semenychev D.V., Kochkin A.D. (2013). Dinamika i prognozy zabolevaemosti dobrokachestvennoj giperplaziej predstatel'noj zhelezy v Nizhegorodskoj oblasti [Dynamics and forecasts of the incidence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the Nizhny Novgorod region]. Jeksperimental'naja i klinicheskaja urologija [Experimental and clinical urology], 3, 4-7. (In Russ.)
2. Apolikhin O.I., Sivkov A.V., Zolotukhin O.V., Shaderkin I.A., Voitko D.A., Prosyannikov M.Yu., Ivanov V.M., Golovanov S.A., Katibov M.I. (2018). Rasprostranennost' simptomov narushenija funkcii nizhnih mochevyh putej u muzhchin po rezul'tatam populjacionnogo issledovanija [The prevalence of symptoms of impaired lower urinary tract function in men according to a population study]. Jeksperimental'naja i klinicheskaja urologija [Experimental and clinical urology],1, 4-12. (In Russ.)
3. da Silva R.D., Bidikov L., Michaels W. et al. (2015). Bipolar energy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a current systematic review of the literature. Can J Urol, 22 Suppl 1, 30-44.
4. Danilov VV, Osinkin KS, Danilov VV, Sevryukov F.A. (2018). Al'fa1-adrenoblokatory i giperaktivnost' detruzora u pacientov s adenomoj predstatel'noj zhelezy [Alpha1-blockers and detrusor hyperactivity in patients with prostate adenoma]. Voprosy urologii i andrologii [Questions of urology and andrology], 6(2), 49-53.
5. Foo K.T. (2019). What is a disease? What is the disease clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)? // World J Urol, Feb. 25, pp 1–4.
6. Geavlete B, Stanescu F, Iacoboaie C, Geavlete P. (2013). Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate vs open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia cases - A medium term, prospective, randomized comparison. BJU Int. May, 111(5), 793–803.
7. Gilling P. (2014). TURP remains a safe and effective alternative for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery. BJU Int., 113(1), 5–6.
8. Ilchenko, G.V., Ishchenko O.Y., Linova E.N. (2018). Ocenka organizacionnoj lojal'nosti v medicinskih uchrezhdenijah [Assessment of organizational loyalty in medical institutions]. International Journal of Medicine and Psychology, 1(4), 24–35.
9. Kahokehr A., Gilling P.J. (2014). Enucleation techniques for benign prostate obstruction: which one and why? Current Opinion in Urology, 24(1), 49–55.
10. Kalininskaya A.A., Mashin A.G., Sevryukov F.A. (2013). Faktory riska razvitija giperplazii predstatel'noj zhelezy [Risk factors for developing prostatic hyperplasia]. Social'nye aspekty zdorov'ja naselenija [Social aspects of public health], 29(1), 1-9. (In Russ.)
11. Kalininskaya A.A., Sevryukov F.A. (2012). Sovremennye vozmozhnosti transuretral'noj jelektrorezekcii v fiziologicheskom rastvore v lechenii zabolevanij nizhnih mochevyh putej i prostaty [Modern possibilities of transurethral electroresection in physiological saline in the treatment of diseases of the lower urinary tract and prostate]. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal jeksperimental'nogo obrazovanija [International Journal of Experimental Education], 6, 41-43. (In Russ.)
12. Kamalov A.A., Sevryukov F.A. (2012). Izuchenie jeffektivnosti bipoljarnoj transuretral'noj rezekcii adenomy prostaty srednih i malyh razmerov [Study of the effectiveness of bipolar transurethral resection of adenomas of the prostate of medium and small sizes]. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine [Modern technologies in medicine], 4, 68-72. (In Russ.)
13. Kamyshov S.V., Pulatov D.A., Yuldasheva N.S. (2017). Ispol'zovanie metodov gravitacionnoj hirurgii krovi v kompleksnom lechenii bol'nyh rakom jaichnika [The use of methods of gravitational blood surgery in the complex treatment of patients with ovarian cancer]. Vestnik Nacional'nogo mediko-hirurgicheskogo centra im. N.I. Pirogova [Bulletin of the National medical and surgical center after N. I. Pirogova], 12(1), 52–56. (In Russ.)
14. Khamurzaev S.Sh., Kulikova N.G. (2013). Puti snizhenija invalidnosti u lic trudosposobnogo vozrasta [Ways of decreasing disability in persons of working age]. Problemy social'noj gigieny, zdravoohranenija i istorii mediciny [Problems of social hygiene, health care and medical history], 6, 29–31. (In Russ.)
15. Kulikova N.G. (2004). Pervichnaja profilaktika oslozhnennyh involjucionno-vozrastnyh disreguljacij u lic starshe 40 let [Primary prevention of complicated involution-age dysregulations in persons older than 40 years]. Problemy social'noj gigieny, zdravoohranenija i istorii mediciny [Problems of social hygiene, health care and medical history], 5, 27–28. (In Russ.)
16. Li M., Qiu J., Hou Q. et al. (2015). Endoscopic enucleation versus open prostatectomy for treating large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, 10(3), e0121265.
17. Liu C., Zheng S., Li H., Xu K. (2010). Transurethral enucleation and resection of prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia by plasma kinetics. J Urol, 184(6), 2440–2445.
18. Luo Y.-H., Shen J.-H., Guan R.-Y., Li H., Wang J. (2014). Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate vs plasmakinetic resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison of outcomes according to prostate size in 310 patients. Urol, 84(4), 904–910.
19. Mark S., Roger K., Scott D., Chris I. (2015). Burden of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) - Focus on the UK. BJU International, 115(4), 508–519.
20. Pulatov D.A., Ibragimov J.M., Kamyshov S.V. (2017). Sravnitel'naja ocenka toksichnosti lechenija bol'nyh himiorezistentnym kolorektal'nym rakom [Comparative assessment of toxicity of treatment of patients with chemoresistant colorectal cancer]. Onkologija i radiologija Kazahstana [Oncology and radiology of Kazakhstan], 2(44), 58–61. (In Russ.)
21. Rao J.-M., Xiao H.-J., Ren Y.-X. et al. (2014). Did prostate size affect the complication and outcome of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate? International Urology and Nephrology, 46(11), 2063–2070.
22. Rao J.-M., Yang J.-R., Ren Y.-X., He J., Ding P., Yang J.-H. (2013). Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate versus transvesical open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia >80 mL: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Urol., 82, 176–181.
23. Salalykina E.V. Papikyan O.A. (2018). Optimization of the nursing staff in the Central regional hospital [Voprosy optimizacii raboty srednego medicinskogo personala v uslovijah central'noj rajonnoj bol'nicy]. International Journal of Medicine and Psychology, 1(2), 12–16.
24. Semenychev D.V., Sevryukov F.A., Sorokin D.A., Karpukhin I.V., Puchkin A.B., Kochkin A.D., Knutov A.V. (2015). Sravnitel'naja ocenka bipoljarnoj transuretral'noj vaporezekcii (TUVRB) i bipoljarnoj rezekcii (TURIS) v lechenii dobrokachestvennoj giperplazii prostaty [Comparative evaluation of bipolar transurethral vapor resection (TUVRB) and bipolar resection (TURIS) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia]. Medicinskij vestnik Bashkortostana [Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan], 10(3), 16-19. (In Russ.)
25. Semenychev D.V., Sevryukov F.A., Sorokin D.A., Karpukhin I.V., Puchkin A.B., Kochkin A.D. (2014). Opyt primenenija bipoljarnoj vaporezekcii predstatel'noj zhelezy (TUVRB) v lechenii DGPZh [Experience with the use of bipolar vapor resection of the prostate gland (TUVRB) in the treatment of BPH]. Jeksperimental'naja i klinicheskaja urologija [Experimental and clinical urology], 2, 49-53. (In Russ.)
26. Sevryukov F.A. (2012). Metodika prognozirovanija rezul'tatov transuretral'noj jenukleacii predstatel'noj zhelezy bol'shih razmerov [The method for predicting the results of transurethral enucleation of the prostate gland of large sizes]. Moskovskij hirurgicheskij zhurnal [Moscow Surgical Journal], 3 (25), 38-42. (In Russ.)
27. Sevryukov F.A. (2012). Kachestvo zhizni bol'nyh posle transuretral'noj jenukleacii adenomy predstatel'noj zhelezy bol'shih razmerov [The quality of life of patients after transurethral enucleation of large prostate adenomas]. Andrologija i genital'naja hirurgija [Andrology and genital surgery], 13(3), 42-46. (In Russ.)
28. Sevryukov F.A., Kamaev I.A., Mushroom M.N., Perevezentsev E.A., Malinina O.Yu., Elina Yu.A. (2011). Faktory riska i kachestvo zhizni bol'nyh s dobrokachestvennoj giperplaziej predstatel'noj zhelezy [Risk factors and quality of life in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia]. Rossijskij mediko-biologicheskij vestnik imeni akademika I.P. Pavlova [I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald], 3, 48-52. (In Russ.)
29. Stucki P., Marini L., Mattei A., Xafis K., Boldini M., Danuser H. (2015). Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial focusing on bleeding complications. J Urol, 193(4), 1371–1376.
30. Zhang K.-Y., Xing J.-C., Chen B.-S., Liu C.-X., Lau H.-W., Sim H.-G., Foo K.-T. (2011). Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate vs. transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate: pre- and postoperative comparisons of parameters used in assessing benign prostatic enlargement. Singap Med J., 52(10), 747–775.

Published

2018-12-25

How to Cite

Glotov, N. A., Sokolov, N. E., & Smolyakov, Y. B. (2018). The first experience of bipolar transurethral operations in surgery of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Voprosy Ecologii, 8(4), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.25726/NM.2019.71.95.002

Issue

Section

Articles